May 2009 Archives

Some of you may be familiar with Derek Sivers, the founder of CD Baby.  Since officially selling CD Baby last year, he has been active online with his music blog among other projects.  In the past he and I have had our differences when it comes to standards.  In spite of this, I find this to be a very sweet story, and since I'm all about admiration of older performers/artists, I think it is worth sharing:

http://sivers.org/sammy-cahn
Yes, I know this is a story from last week, but between going away for the Memorial Day weekend and having a cold, I haven't gotten around to posting this comment:

So there will be no JVC Jazz Festival this year in New York City.  Whatever the reasons - and the NYT article cited many - it is unfortunate.

Ironically, in a "Take Five" posted recently on allaboutjazz.com, I responded that more younger people need to be involved on the business side of music, when asked "What are some of the essential requirements to keep jazz alive and growing?".  The JVC Jazz Festival Event organizer is a thirty-something guy, a Columbia undergrad.  Basically, the kind of person I was talking about in my response.  I do hope he'll be able to make a go of it eventually.  I agree with him that "destination" music events can be a successful, but they may have to expand their portfolio to include more events that aren't specifically jazz events.  I think it would be cool to do a rock and jazz festival, of course since that basically encompasses my taste in music.  I'm not talking about these festivals that are "jazz" in name only, but a festival actually billed as duo-genre event with acts representing both kinds of music.

The thought of my ideal rock-jazz festival leads me also to the observation that in this economy music events targeted towards younger audiences (rock, hip hop) are doing much better than music events targeted towards older audiences (classical, jazz).  I don't know much about the reasons for this year's JVC Jazz Festival cancellation beyond what I read in the NYT article, but you don't hear anything negative about South by or Coachella or the upcoming Bonnaroo.  In fact, when it comes to South by, all you hear about is how the festival gets bigger every year. 

The NYT article quoted one person by name and mentioned others on the business side of jazz concerned that the cancellation of this event would indicate that jazz is not a marketable music.  To me the cancellation of this year's event regardless of its specific reasons represents decades worth of missteps by the powers that be in jazz, most notably the marginalization of fusion.  (I know Joe Zawinul is smiling down on me as I write this.)  It's just unreasonable to expect someone who grew up listening to rock or r&b or hip-hop or world music to readily take to bebop or retro standards.  Then, you get into the bigger issues - the paucity and haphazardness of cultural education in this country, the primacy of the tv and the internet as people's entertainment choices, the way in which this culture measures something's worth by its current monetary value. 

I really do hope that the JVC Jazz Festival will be back in some form or another next year.  If it does happen again next year, my guess is that it will be a smaller festival.  I unfortunately also could see it coming back as a more straight-ahead festival like Tanglewood's, a somewhat reactionary response to this year's cancellation.  Ultimately, I think it's unwise to place too much emphasis or hope on these big events.  The future health and viability of jazz and standards will depend on younger, independent musicians who make music that is relevant to their generation's experience, and not on these big events, which by nature represent the status quo.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/arts/music/20jazz.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=jvc%20jazz%20festival&st=cse
For the past month I have been promoting my new CD, I'm in Heaven Tonight, on allaboutjazz.com.  As part of this promotion, I completed their "Take Five" questionnaire.  (Sorry to those of you who thought this post was about the Brubeck tune!)  If you are interested in reading it, I have pasted it below.  You can also follow this link - http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=32845 - to read it on their site.

I have an update to the "What is in the near future?" question below.  I will be performing twice before my August due date.  Once again weather permitting, I will be at the Brandeis High School Garden for Make Music New York Day on Sunday, June 21st at 4pm.  I will also be doing a set at the Metropolitan Room in July, date to be determined.

Take Five With Sarah DeLeo
Sarah DeLeo - Published: May 16, 2009

Meet Sarah DeLeo:
Jazz vocalist Sarah DeLeo takes the best from the masters and combines it with her own signature style to produce a sound that is both timeless and fresh.

One hears her singing and is swept away to another time, and yet her powerful presence as a musical storyteller is thoroughly in the here and now: No matter the song, she delivers each lyric in such a personal way that the listener feels as if they are hearing their own stories. Her tireless exploration of many different styles of music yields fascinating results when it comes to song choices and arrangements, and her inventive melodic improvisation makes every restatement of a tune's melody thoroughly engaging--nothing's ever the same twice.

In October 2005 Sarah released her debut CD, The Nearness of You, which garnered critical acclaim and introduced Sarah's work to both national and international audiences. Her follow up to that release is 2009's I'm In Heaven Tonight, another inspired collection of songs that combines the old and the new.

Instrument(s):
Voice.

Your sound and approach to music:
I view my work as a reconciliation between the rock, R&B, and pop genres, which have been mainstream music during my lifetime, and a calling to sing standards and a propensity towards jazz. The singers who influenced me the most when I was younger were pretty high energy--Judy Garland, Barbra Streisand, Ella Fitzgerald, Aretha Franklin--but my singing tends to be mellow, because that's how I am.

I approach every tune the same way, regardless of its originating genre. I break down each song harmonically and rhythmically. I also speak the lyrics. I once read an interview of Cassandra Wilson, in which she described her approach to music as a "jazz approach." I thought that term was an apt way to describe what I do as well.

Road story: Your best or worst experience:
Last year, I got a call to do an event on Make Music New York day for NYC Councilmember, Gale Brewer. I accepted, but I really had no idea how this event would go. It was going to be held at an outdoor garden, and there was no alternate location in case of bad weather. For most of the week prior, the forecast called for rain. I was assured that there would be an electrical outlet for our equipment, but I wasn't necessarily convinced.

We showed up at the gig and what ended up surprising me the most was the audience. I generally sing for people in their mid-20s to mid-60s, usually trending younger--40s and under. As a result, when I'm singing, I'm not only entertaining people, but also educating them, since most people my age are not too familiar with standards or jazz. By contrast, the median age at this Make Music New York gig was about 65 with a number of people in wheelchairs. If I had known what kind of audience they expected, I probably would have put together a set of more traditional standards. However, I didn't, so I just did the set I had prepared--the kind of set I would normally do. I did the White Stripes tune, the somewhat non-traditional arrangements of standards that I do, and some standards and blues, which I consider more obscure.

It got a great response. People were singing along, not to the White Stripes tune obviously, but definitely to the standards and even the songs I thought were more obscure. (The guitarist on the gig, Chris Bergson, was throwing in all these rock licks; I was giggling to myself throughout).

One lady came up to me after the gig and told me how much I reminded her of Lee Wiley. I was so flattered. It has always been important for me to sing to people my own age for a number of reasons, but I never realized how much harder it was on me until then. Singing to an older audience familiar with the material was so much easier. I didn't have to educate anyone; I could just entertain. It was a very enjoyable experience, which was both relaxing and energizing at the same time! I had no idea how this gig was going to turn out, but in the end it was a lot of fun!

Also, the weather turned out beautiful and thankfully there was electricity and an adequate PA setup. What a relief!

The first Jazz album I bought was:

I bought these on the same trip to the mall:

Janis Siegel, At Home;
Modern Jazz Quartet, Blues on Bach.

What do you think is the most important thing you are contributing musically?

During the first ten years in which I sang standards and listened to jazz, I knew no one who shared my interests. As such, my formative years as a singer were spent isolated artistically, which at times was lonely, but which in retrospect freed me to follow my own creative path. I was like a tabula rasa in some ways. I do bear the imprint of the Top 40 music that I listened to as a child and the very melodic stuff I remember my parents listening to when I was a kid--Barry Manilow, '70s Babs, Neil Diamond. Yet, when it comes to standards and jazz, I didn't grow up with any preconceived notions about what the music should or should not be, what was good or bad, what was the right or wrong way, etc. As a result, I was able to develop my own style and sound, and bring my generational perspective to this genre.

Did you know...
I studied the flute for eight years. I enjoyed playing the flute, and was a decent flute player (At the end of my studies I was working on Hindemith.), but I was always a much better singer. It actually caused some tension with my flute teacher, because I would sometimes refer to the pieces I was working on as songs. He didn't necessarily appreciate that my mind was more on singing than on the flute.

CDs you are listening to now:
e.s.t, Seven Days of Falling (215 Records);
Greyboy Allstars, What Happened to Television? (SCI Fidelity Records);
Paul Simon, Still Crazy After All These Years (Rhino Records).

What are some of the essential requirements to keep jazz alive and growing?
More younger people need to be involved on the business side in every capacity--booking managers and club owners, radio DJs and program managers, editors and reviewers, event organizers, personal managers, publicists, etc. There are certainly enough younger people making music, but there are not enough people our age on the business side to support us. This will become more critical as today's 60- and 70-year-olds, who in my experience form the core of the business side, start to age out.

What is in the near future?
I plan on fitting in one more gig before I give birth in August. I have a number of administrative and creative projects in mind for my maternity leave, and then next year, once my new baby situation is more settled, I plan on gigging more, specifically in promotion of my new CD.

By Day:
I am at home with my two-year-old son. I am expecting my second child in August!

"You're Getting to be a Habit with Me" is the featured download of the day on allaboutjazz.com

Please follow this link to the site: http://www.allaboutjazz.com/
If you have not done so already, I encourage you to check out the updated gallery page on this web site!!  It includes pictures from last month's gig in Connecticut, the I'm in Heaven Tonight recording session, and a few other pictures from the recent and the less recent past.

Barbara Cook

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Years ago someone told me that I would love Barbara Cook.  It took me until last year to see her for the first time.  The great limiting factor to be upfront was the cost.  It's about $100 minimum to see her.  That's a lot of money.  Also, she performs in nice clubs, and as I generally go out alone, it's somewhat intimidating to go into a really nice club by yourself.  It's easy to sneak into a dive bar/music club on your own, but much more awkward to do that somewhere like the Carlyle, where I saw her for the first time last year.

In the intervening years I had also had a change of heart about seeing older performers.  In the past I had not gone to see a lot of older singers, because guys (meaning musicians) told me that they weren't as good as they used to be.  Being a woman, I took someone else's not-so-good advice seriously, instead of making my own decision.  In 2006, the year before my son was born, I was like eff it.  Even if these people aren't exactly how they used to be, I still should go see them.  As a result, I've seen Mark Murphy, Ernestine Anderson, Annie Ross, and Jimmy Scott a number of times.  Unfortunately, I missed Blossom Dearie, Barbara Lea, and Freddie Hubbard, but hopefully I won't miss anyone else.  I saw Barbara Cook for the first time last year at the Carlyle.  It was a magical experience.  When it was over, I was sad that I had to leave the club.  I wanted to stay in that wonderful bubble following her performance for as long as possible, rather than go out into the real world. 

Despite having loved her performance at the Carlyle last year, I still arrived at Feinstein's Tuesday night thinking, "Shit, this is a lot of money to spend."  It's not easy to tell your husband that you are going to be spending over $100 to see a singer, whatever the state of the economy is, and no matter how wonderful the singer is.  I also had lots of other things on my mind.  I hadn't seen my husband all week, because he had been away on business.  I've been really busy working on the promotion of my new CD, in particular getting in some gigs before I have my 2nd child in August.  As to be expected, I was among a handful of people in the audience under the age of 50, which I always find depressing.  I got there a few minutes before it started and was afraid I wouldn't be able to see well from where they sat me.  I thought to myself, "What the heck am I doing here?" 

Then, the show started.  Through the first few songs, I still had that "What the heck am I doing here?" feeling, coupled with a fear that this year's experience would not compare to last year's.  After a few songs, all of my anxiety dissipated.  Barbara Cook is truly a wonderful singer.  I could hear her sing "Where or When" 1000x.  She also sings Sondheim so well.  There are some people who are crazy about Sondheim, but I am not one of them.  I think that hearing a very skilled, experienced performer like Barbara Cook sing these tunes outside of the context of the show, for which they were written, made me appreciate them a lot more.  I also find it quite amusing how she calls him "Steve" or "Stephen".

Not only is she a fantastic interpreter with a lovely voice, but she also sets up the tunes so beautifully with her patter.  At the show I saw this year she spoke a lot more in between songs than she did in the show I saw last year.  She told a very amusing story about her obsession with an opera singer.  She told a very funny story about staying up late watching You Tube.  She spoke about how she never performed Cole Porter songs, probably because she didn't really identify with them.  Throughout I had this laugh of recognition, because I could relate to everything that she said. 

I remember in last year's show to set up a ballad she made a comment about how when you are in a relationship, you want the other person to tell you what you want to hear, but how that sometimes doesn't happen.  Well, I'm paraphrasing her, because she said it more succinctly, but that was her point.  At the time I was rehearsing my new CD, I'm in Heaven Tonight, and what she said really resonated with me, in particular in reference to one song on the album.  Even now when I think about her comment and how true it is, it makes me somewhat emotional.

During the show I thought about the patter and the songs she chose and I couldn't help the feeling that as I watched her, I was looking at myself - the good side and the dark side - 40 plus years on, minus the Broadway shows.  I've always known that I am a singer for a reason, but sometimes I can be sort of inward looking and forgetful that there are others who are singers for a reason as well.  Then again, she does what a singer should do - allow the audience to see their own experience in the material.  I only know my own life, but still in Barbara Cook I see a set of experiences and a way of thinking that are very familiar to me, a little too familiar.
 
Having seen her perform now a couple of times and having read a few interviews of her, she comes across to me as someone who is painfully honest with herself and someone who also has the ability to laugh at herself.  These qualities I believe are what make her a such a good singer.  I can be brutally honest with myself at times as well, but I don't think I'm really at the point in my life where I can process things so readily or laugh at myself so easily.  Maybe that will come with time.  In the meantime, unfortunately for my husband, I'll be shelling out another $100 next year and in every other year that she is still performing.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from May 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

April 2009 is the previous archive.

June 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.